The National Testing Agency (NTA) requires deep structural strengthening to address recurring examination-security concerns, but replacing the agency altogether may not be the most useful solution, former University Grants Commission (UGC) Chairman Mamidala Jagadesh Kumar has said.Speaking to PTI, Kumar, who chairs the Review Committee for the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, said the recurring paper-leak issue should be viewed as an “end-to-end examination-security challenge,” given the scale and complexity of examinations conducted by the agency.
Scale of the challenge
The Centre recently ordered several measures to strengthen the NTA and the examination system following the NEET-UG paper leak, which triggered widespread student protests and led to the resignation of a minister, along with subsequent errors in the UGC-NET exam.The government has since set up a high-level committee under technocrat Nandan Nilekani, while a law to curb unfair means in public examinations was passed in the recently concluded Parliament session, providing for greater punishments.“NTA operates examinations involving more than one crore candidates each year. At this scale, security depends on subject experts, digital systems, printers, transport, storage, centres, invigilators and service providers,” Kumar said.He said the Radhakrishnan Committee had examined the entire testing process and recommended stronger standard operating procedures, better data security, clear responsibility and closer coordination with states.“The government and NTA have since introduced several recommended measures. The long-term solution is continuous risk assessment, fewer people handling confidential material, digital traceability and independent checks at every stage,” Kumar said, adding that these measures could “steadily make breaches much harder and protect students’ trust.”
Not a case of overburdening
Asked whether the NTA had become overburdened with too many examinations, Kumar said its workload was “very large,” but the sheer number of examinations did not by itself prove the agency was overburdened.“The real issue is the complexity behind each examination,” he said, adding that the Radhakrishnan Committee had proposed a partnership model in which ministries, regulators or institutions seeking an examination should take responsibility for the syllabus, subject experts, question quality and academic validation. The NTA, he said, can provide the secure platform, centre network, candidate verification, examination delivery and result processing.On whether different examinations should be handled by different agencies, Kumar said he would not recommend dividing examinations among several agencies merely to reduce visible workload.“A single national testing body offers common security standards, technology, candidate services and result procedures. Creating many new agencies could duplicate costs and produce uneven safeguards,” he said.
Traceability at every handover
Kumar said the entire examination system needed to be reviewed holistically, covering question setting, translation, review, digital storage, printing or transmission, centres and invigilation.“Every handover needs traceability and strict access control,” he said, stressing the need for permanent expertise in test design, cyber-security, languages, quality analysis, logistics and vendor management.“Centre quality and candidate support must remain consistent across hundreds of cities,” he said, noting that the Radhakrishnan Committee had addressed these areas and that considerable action had followed. The government reported in July that 35 of the committee’s 46 major action points had been implemented.
No overhaul, but reform
On whether the NTA needed a complete overhaul, Kumar said the agency had accumulated experience, technology, examination records and a national centre network, which should be improved rather than discarded.“NTA needs deep structural strengthening, but replacing the institution itself may not be the most useful answer,” he said.He described the reported refresh of about 600 experts, the onboarding of new specialists and the introduction of four-tier question-paper scrutiny as important steps.“My assessment is that the expert-panel refresh is a strong corrective measure. Yet no single measure can complete an institution-wide reform. The wider reform programme is therefore necessary and is underway,” Kumar said.He said the government’s long-term approach should be to develop the NTA as a “mission-critical professional institution,” with clearly defined responsibilities, institutional links with states and requesting bodies functioning as active knowledge partners. These recommendations, he said, provided a “sound roadmap,” and government action had already begun through senior appointments, specialist leadership positions, authentication systems and state-level coordination.On whether existing infrastructure was adequate for high-stakes examinations at scale, Kumar said the focus should not be merely on whether infrastructure existed but on how the agency kept pace with changing needs.“Infrastructure must therefore be tested and upgraded continuously,” he said, adding that the next stage should focus on creating more accredited centres, preferably in dependable public institutions. “NTA’s capacity is strong but it should continue to grow with its increasing responsibilities,” he said.
Three priorities
Kumar identified three reforms that should receive immediate priority: securing the complete examination lifecycle, building permanent professional capacity and making examination centres and candidate services dependable.On examination security, he said every stage, from question selection, translation and review to storage, printing or digital delivery and centre-level handling, should create a secure record of every access or change. “The new four-tier question-paper check should be combined with limited access, encryption and independent security testing,” he said.The second priority, he said, should be building permanent professional capacity in test design, cyber-security, languages, quality analysis, logistics and candidate communication. “The recent leadership strengthening, expert-panel refresh and specialist recruitment are useful beginnings,” he said, adding that selection, conflict-of-interest disclosure, training and performance review should become regular institutional processes.The third priority should be ensuring dependable examination centres and candidate services, Kumar said.“Accredited centres should provide CCTV monitoring, biometric verification, reliable power, connectivity, accessibility and trained staff,” he said.
